[0:00]Hey, how old is the earth? Scientifically or biblically? I guess both. Biblically around 6 to 10,000 years old. Okay, and scientifically? No older than 60,000. What? Then why do scientists say that it's like 14 billion years old? That's not science, that's religion. No, that's what science says. No, that's what presuppositional circular reasoning based on a guess will tell you. What do you mean? Scientifically, the Earth cannot be older than 60,000 years old. How so? Assuming a constant rate of decay and therefore entropy, with something like carbon 14, we would eventually see it reach an equilibrium, which for carbon 14 having a half-life of 5,730 years, that would line up somewhere between 30,000 and 57,000 years. We're not close to an equilibrium yet, which means that that equilibrium has yet to be reached. Therefore, the Earth cannot exceed 60,000 years scientifically. That what, wait, then what does carbon dating prove? Carbon dating only actually proves that the Earth isn't nearly as old as they want to pretend it is. Well, why would they want to pretend that it's older? To remove God from the equation. Why? Well, if God created everything, then that means there is an objective morality and they don't like that. But how would it being older mean that there is no God? Well, because everything that we see can either be explained by the Bible or billions and billions of years. Like what? Well, like you know the sedimentary layers that they use to date fossils. Yeah. Well, either those are a result of millions of years of erosion over a vast amount of different weather environments, or there was a catastrophic global flood that would have done that within weeks or months. Okay, but wouldn't it be easier to assume using the long time frame standpoint? Well, whenever you see a petrified tree that is standing vertically between those sedimentary layers, and we see them cross various layers, meaning that that tree, even if we date it to be 100 years old, it has to be millions of years old in order to have grown vertically through multiple layers of the sediments. What else? Well, if the Earth is less than 10,000 years, then that means that God created every different kind of creature at the same time. And in opposition to that? Evolution, which would require billions of years and require that the law of entropy does not exist. How so? Because entropy is a proven law, it is the second law of thermodynamics, and that means that everything will decay, that it will get worse over time, which is the exact opposite of evolution, which says that everything will somehow get bigger, better, smarter, brighter, as a result of death. So it really isn't scientific to claim that the Earth is billions of years old. No, it's very religious, but they try to view their science from the perspective of that religion, while at the same time trying to pretend that it's not a religion.
Transcript source
YouTube auto captions
This transcript was extracted from YouTube's auto-generated caption track. The transcript below is server-rendered so it can be read, searched, cited, and shared without opening the original YouTube player.
Pull quotes
[0:00]No, that's what presuppositional circular reasoning based on a guess will tell you.
[0:00]We're not close to an equilibrium yet, which means that that equilibrium has yet to be reached.
[0:00]Carbon dating only actually proves that the Earth isn't nearly as old as they want to pretend it is.
[0:00]Well, if God created everything, then that means there is an objective morality and they don't like that.
Use this transcript
Related transcript hubs
Watch on YouTube
Share
MORE TRANSCRIPTS



