[0:00]Socrates ke paas do options the, ya toh woh shehar chhod jaae, ya phir maut ko gale lagaa le. Agar woh shehar chhod jaata toh aaj 2,500 saal baad bhi hum log is azeem falsafe ke baare mein guftugu na kar rahe hote. Mera zindagi ka ab tak ka experience yeh kehta hai ke kabhi kabaar sahi sawaal sahi jawaab se zyada aham ho jaate hain. Philosophers yaani falsafiyon ki greatness yeh hoti hai ke they dare to question. Un mein sawaal karne ka passion hota hai, justuju hoti hai, curiosity hoti hai. Woh bhed bakriyon ki tarah muashre ko follow nahi karte, balki society mein maujood jo irrational aqeedah parasti hai use challenge karte hain aur logon ko ek nayi soch dete hain. Book buddies, yeh jo sawaal karne ki jurrat hai na, yeh in philosophers ki sabse badi superpower hoti hai. Yehi wajah hai ke hazaaron saal tak in logon ka naam zinda rehta hai. Aaj jis falsafi ki hum log baat karenge, usne sirf apne sawaalaat se na sirf apne muashre mein balki western philosophy mein ek aisa impact chhoda hai which is unparalleled. Uske sawaalaat ne uski curiosity ne us waqt ke hukmraanon ko itna pareshan kiya ke unke paas use rokne ke liye use maarne ke siwaaye koi chaara na raha. Lekin aaj dekhen, un hukmraanon ko un rulers ko koi nahi jaanta. Lekin woh chhote se qad ka mota sa maila sa philosopher aaj bhi philosophy ki duniya par raaj karta hai. Main baat kar raha hoon the great Socrates ki. Socrates ka ek dost tha jo ek din ek priestess ke paas gaya aur usne usse ek sawaal kiya. Sawaal tha ke who is the wisest man in the world? Puri duniya mein sabse daana sabse aqalmand shakhs kaun hai? Delphi ki us priestess ne jawaab diya ke is puri duniya mein Socrates se zyada daana aur aqalmand shakhs koi bhi nahi. Jab Socrates ko yeh baat pata lagi toh woh hairaan pareshan ho gaya. Curious toh woh tha, lihaza yeh baat uske dilo-dimaag mein baith gayi. Aur amazingly, is soch ko disprovve karne ke liye, galat saabit karne ke liye, woh apni society ke jo sabse knowledgeable shakhs the, unke paas gaya, taake woh priestess ki is statement ko sahi tarah samajh sake. Usne in padhe likhe logon se aqalmand knowledgeable logon se sawaal karne shuru kiye. Socrates ka tareeqa bada hi unique lekin kaafi simple tha. Woh logon se sawaal karta with the standpoint that he knows nothing. Woh baat ka aaghaaz hi aise karta jaise use kuch maaloom hi nahi hai. Aur baaton baaton mein woh logon se sawaal dar sawaal karke unke arguments ko aise expose karta ke un logon ko khud ba khud andaaza ho jaata ke unki knowledge ke andar, unke arguments ke andar gap maujood hai. Inhi discussion se finally use realize hua ke priestess ne use lekar jo baat kahi hai woh durust kyun hai. Woh sabse aqalmand aur daana shakhs isliye nahi kyunke uske paas knowledge hai. Balki woh aqalmand isliye kyunke woh jaanta hai ke woh kuch nahi jaanta. Yehi se Socrates ka woh quote nikla hai jo bahut mashhoor hai. I know that I know nothing. Socrates ka yeh jo question par question karne ka tareeqa tha na, isse Socratic ya phir dialectical method kehte hain. Dialectical ka matlab hota hai do opposing point of views ke darmiyan dialogue karna, argument karna. Doston, yeh jo dialectical method hai na, yeh badi zabardast cheez hai. Kyunke iske zariye ba'asaani aap logon ke arguments ke andar ki false assumptions aur bemaani ki logic ke baare mein pata laga sakte hain. Yeh baat main aapko ek misaal se samjhaata hoon. Ancient Greece ke jo log the na, unke bahut se khuda the. Apollo, Dionysus, Artemis, Zeus, Athena and many more. Logon ka in khudaon par bharpur imaan tha aur woh claim yeh kiya karte the ke khudaon ko sab pata hota hai. Bas yehi se ab hum apna Socratic argument shuru karte hain. Socrates ke baare mein amusing baat yeh thi ke woh hamesha us shakhs ko pakadta tha jo yeh claim karta tha ke bhai mera is subject ke baare mein bharpur knowledge hai.
[4:25]Toh chahe woh koi mazhabi scholar ho, politician ho ya phir law man ho. So Socrates ek shakhs se sawaal karta hai. So tumhe lagta hai ke tumhare khuda sab kuch jaante hain? You think that the Gods know everything? Toh dusra shakhs aage se jawaab deta hai ke yes, of course they do. Woh sab kuch jaante hain kyunke woh khuda hain. Iske upar phir Socrates ek sawaal karta hai, kya kuch khuda aapas mein disagree bhi karte hain? Yaani ke khudaon ke darmiyan bhi koi ikhtelaaf hota hai? Is sawaal par woh shakhs jawaab deta hai ke bilkul hota hai. In fact woh kehta hai ke hamare khuda toh har waqt aapas mein ladte rehte hain. Is par phir Socrates sawaal karta hai, so khudaon ke darmiyan is baat par ikhtelaaf hai ke kya sahi hai aur kya galat? Us shakhs ka jawaab hota hai, bilkul, yeh baat theek hai. Is jawaab par Socrates yaani Socrates usse phir sawaal karta hai. Ke tumhare is jawaab ke mutaabiq kuch khuda kabhi kabaar galat ho sakte hain? Woh shakhs pareshani mein thoda soch kar jawaab deta hai ke waaqei mein yeh baat sahi hai.
[5:24]Khuda galat ho sakte hain. Socrates finally is dialogue ko is sentence par close karta hai. Ke chunke tum khud keh rahe ho ke khuda galat ho sakte hain, lihaza yeh baat bhi durust hai ke khudaon ko sab kuch nahi pata. Dekha aapne ke kaise kuch hi sawaalon ke zariye pura argument tabah o barbaad ho gaya. Socrates isi tareeqe se logon ke pairon ke neeche se zameen nikaal liya karta tha, jiski wajah se log embarrass hua karte the. Aur yehi sharmindigi bil aakhir Socrates ko lekar nafrat mein badal gayi. Lekin Athens ki jo youth thi na, woh Socrates se bharpur inspired thi. Jab woh Athens ke chowk chauraha par khada hokar logon se sawaal kiya karta toh wahan par bheed lag jaaya karti thi.
[6:10]Aur jab woh apne saamne wale shakhs ko usi ke arguments ke andar uljha diya karta tha, toh log hairaan pareshan hote the aur is dialogue ke zariye bahut kuch seekha karte the. Lekin doston sawaal yeh banta hai ke Socrates aakhir apne sawaalaat ke zariye kya saabit karna chahta tha? What did he actually want? Kya uska maqsad sirf logon ko embarrass karna sharminda karna tha ya he actually was curious to know about the reality of life? Dekhiye Socrates ko sahi tarah samajhne ke liye hume us waqt ka jo Athens tha, uski detailed study karni padegi. Socrates ka janm Athens mein hua in the year 470 BC. Yeh woh daur tha jab Athens Greek world ka cultural capital tha aur wahan nayi soch ka, naye falsafe ka bolbaala tha. Socrates se pehle natural philosophers ka focus tha on the nature of the physical world. Yaani ke unka falsafa qoodrat aur maddi duniya tak limited tha. Lekin waqt ke saath saath philosophers ne physical world ki bajaye apna focus kiya individuals ki taraf. Is daur mein Athens ke jo log the na, unke baare mein ek badi unique baat thi. Woh bayanbazi yaani rhetoric se bada impress hua karte the. Unhe woh log bahut baante the jo arguments ke zariye, reasoning ke zariye, mantak ke zariye, logic ke zariye unhe motivate aur convince kiya karte the. In fact Athens ke jo ameer log the, jo elite the, woh apne bachchon ke liye special teacher hire karte the jo unhe art of speech sikhate the, jo unhe taqreer karne ke andaaz bataya karte the. In teachers ya philosophers ko Sophists kaha jaata hai. In Sophists ka kaam tha apni knowledge, apna wisdom, apni taqreer karne ka andaaz logon ko sikha kar unse paise kamana. Sophists ki study ka focus insaan the. Unka concern tha man and his place in society. Isi liye ek mashhoor Sophist falsafi Protagoras ne kaha tha ke man is the measure of all things. Is statement ka matlab yeh hai ke koi bhi cheez sahi hai ya galat,
[8:05]iska decision sirf is baat par hoga ke woh insaan ke liye faaydemand hai ya phir nahi. Socrates ko bhi kuch log Sophist samajhte hain. Lekin woh ek Sophist nahi tha. Pehla toh yeh ke woh Sophists ki tarah logon tak apni knowledge, apna wisdom pahunchane ki koi fees nahi leta tha. Dusri aur important baat yeh ke Sophist argument jeetne ke liye art of persuasion aur rhetoric ka istemal kiya karte the. Jabki dusri taraf Socrates was a very different man. Usne saari umr Athens ke chawk chaurahaon mein guzaar di, logon se baat cheet karte hue. Aur is baat cheet ka maqsad kisi ko neecha dikhana nahi tha, balki woh genuinely cheezon ki gehraai ko samajhna chahta tha. Uske Socratic method ke zariye logon ke andar soch ki nayi rahein khul jaati thi. Woh kehta tha ke jis tarah meri maa ek Daai hai na yaani ke midwife jo bachchon ko paida karne mein madad karti hai. Is tarah main bhi ek midwife hoon. Kyunke mere sawaalon aur guftugu ke zariye logon ke andar nayi soch ki paidaish hoti hai. Lekin Socrates aakhir chahta kya tha? Woh kya cheez thi jo use har waqt itna bechain, itna curious rakhe hue thi? Dekhiye Socrates ka jo falsafa hai na, uska main concern tha life ki examination ke hawaale se. Yehi wajah hai ke usne yeh statement kahi, "An unexamined life is not worth living." Is statement ke andar Socrates ke falsafe ki in fact khud Socrates ki ruh maujood hai. Lihaza isko samajhna zaroori hai. Life ki examination se Socrates ki muraad hai ke zindagi mein sabse important cheez hai self awareness, yaani ke apne baare mein jaanna.
[9:44]Main kaun hoon, main kyun hoon, main kyun paida hua hoon, meri zindagi ka maqsad kya hai? Mera jo belief system hai, mere jo actions hain, meri jo values hain, unki bunyaad kya hai? Socrates ke mutaabiq yeh hamari zindagi ke woh sawaal hain jinko critically analyze karne ke liye agar aapne apni zindagi mein jad-o-jehad na ki, struggle na ki, toh aisi zindagi meaningless hogi, bemaani hogi. Socrates na zindagi ki examination ke zariye ek aur sawaal ka jawaab talaash karta raha. Sawaal bahut hi simple lekin gehra tha, what makes a good life? Ek achi zindagi kaisi hoti hai? Uska maanna tha ke zindagi ka maqsad hai mental peace haasil karna. Aur yeh insaan sirf tab haasil kar sakta hai jab woh sirf wohi kaam kare jo waaqei mein sahi hain. Na ke woh kaam jinke baare mein society kahe ke sahi hai. Virtue yaani achchai ke baare mein bhi Socrates ka nazariya zabardast tha. Uska kehna tha ke insaan ke paas jo sabse qeemti cheez hai na, woh uske virtues hain yaani ke uski achchaiyan hain. Yehi wajah hai ke koi bhi shakhs naturally evil nahi hota. Kisi bhi shakhs ko evil banati hai uski lack of knowledge and wisdom. Yaani ke kisi bhi muashre mein evil shakhs woh hai jiske paas knowledge nahi hai, ilm nahi hai. Is point se Socrates ne woh baat nikali jo meri zindagi ka central principle hai. Usne kaha ke there is only one good in life and that is knowledge and one evil, that is ignorance. Isi hawaale se Plato ka ek dialogue hai jiska title hai Apology. Isme Socrates kya jaanlewa baat karta hai. Socrates kehta hai ke zindagi mein koi bhi ek din aisa nahi hona chahiye jisme aap goodness yaani achchai ko discuss na karein. Aur goodness chunke knowledge hai, lihaza yeh knowledge kisi bhi qism ki dhan daulat se upar hai. Aur darasal knowledge ki pursuit yaani ke ilm haasil karne ke liye jad-o-jehad karna hi zindagi ka asal maqsad hai. Dekhiye yahan par na main aapko ek aur bahut hi important baat batata chalu. Socrates ne puri umr koi kitab nahi likhi. In fact he didn't wrote even a single line. Aaj ki duniya mein hume Socrates ke baare mein jo bhi pata hai, woh pata hai uske ek student ki wajah se jo shayad usse bhi bada philosopher hai. Main baat kar raha hoon Aflatun yaani Plato ki. Plato ne apni writings ke zariye, apne philosophical dialogues ke zariye Socrates ko zinda rakha. Darasal hume Plato ka shukriya ada karna chahiye kyunke usi ki wajah se hume Socrates ke wisdom ke baare mein pata lag saka. Socrates kaha karta tha ke mere andar ek divine voice hai jo hamesha mujhe guide karti rehti hai ke kya sahi hai aur kya galat. Socrates ki in ajeeb-o-gareeb baaton se Athens ka youth toh bahut inspired tha, lekin Athens ke hukmraan bahut ghabraye hue the. Unhe Socrates ki shakal mein ek threat nazar aata tha kyunke uski baaton mein ek aisa charisma tha jo logon ki soch badal sakta tha. Yehi woh waqt tha jab Athens ke karta dhartaon ne faisla kiya ke Socrates ko marna hoga. Dekhiye Socrates ki jo death hai na, woh falsafe ki duniya ka bahut hi important event hai. Uski wajah yeh hai ke Socrates woh pehla falsafi tha jisko uski government ne, uske point of views ki wajah se, uski soch ki wajah se maar diya. Plato ne Socrates ke trial ko cover kiya hai apne dialogue the Apology mein. Yeh dialogue mere raunte khade kar deta hai. Saikdo ki taadad mein jury baithi hui hai aur Socrates tan-tanha apna difa kar raha hai. The Apology ko aage hum log detail mein discuss karte hain. Lekin usse pehle yeh dekh lete hain ke Socrates par aakhir ilzaam kya the. Dekhiye us par kuch bade ilzaam yeh the ke usne Athens ke khudaon ko marne se inkar kar diya hai. He has become impious. Log kehte the ke yeh Socrates ka bachcha hamare khudaon par sawaal uthata hai, logon ke dilon mein doubt create karta hai. Us par dusra ilzaam yeh tha ke uski wajah se Athens ke jo naujawan hain woh corrupt ho rahe hain. Woh naujawanon ki soch par galat asraat daal raha hai. Is ilzaam ki wajah bahut simple thi kyunke Socrates apne students ko har qism ki authority, politics, belief system ko challenge karne ka kaha karta tha. Aur yaad rakhen doston, jo log bhi power mein hote hain unhe woh log bilkul pasand nahi aate jo sawaal karte hain aur jo unki authority ko unki power ko challenge karte hain. Socrates chunke democracy ka bahut bada critic tha, use jamhooriyat bilkul pasand nahi thi, lihaza yeh baat bhi Athens ko bilkul pasand nahi aayi. Socrates us group ka bhi member tha jinhe "Thirty Tyrants" kaha jaata hai aur jinhone 404 BC mein Athens mein democracy ko overthrow kar diya tha. Anyways, Socrates ke trial se pehle aur uske trial ke baad ke jo waaqiyat hai na woh jaanlewa hain. Mere lihaz se Socrates ne trial ke dauran jis qism ka character dikhaya na, darasal unhi cheezon ne uski isi sher dili ne use Socrates banaya. Lihaza uske trial ke waaqiyat ko detail mein discuss karna zaroori hai. Maine aapko bataya na ke Plato ne Socrates ko zinda rakha apne dialogues ke zariye. Aisa hi ek dialogue hai jiska naam hai Euthyphro. So doston, scene yeh hai ke ek shakhs jiska naam hai Euthyphro, woh aur Socrates Athens ke courthouse ke bahar khade hain. Yeh wohi courthouse hai jisme kuch der ke baad Socrates ka trial hone wala hai aur use maut ki saza di jaane wali hai. Lekin sher ka bachcha Socrates aisa tha ke apni maut ke qareeb pahunch kar bhi usne apni behasbazi ko nahi chhoda. Just imagine ke is shakhs ki zindagi maut ka faisla hone wala hai aur woh Euthyphro se discuss yeh kar raha hai ke woh morality jiski basis mazhab yaani ke religion hai. Aur woh morality jiski basis philosophy hai, in dono mein aakhir farq kya hai? Socrates Euthyphro ke saamne daawa yeh karta hai ke woh ikhlaaqiyat ya moral code jo khudaon ki taraf se diya gaya hai, woh kabhi bhi consistent nahi ho sakta. Usme hamesha koi na koi kami beshi zaroor hogi. Uski wajah yeh thi ke Athens ke God hamesha aapas mein ladte rehte the. Unke darmiyan har waqt kisi na kisi baat par disagreement rehta tha. Lihaza ek waqt mein in sab khudaon ko please karna satisfy karna was impossible. Lekin isse bhi important baat yeh hai ke usne Euthyphro se jo apne aapko bahut hi mazhabi shakhs samajhta tha, usse ek aisi baat ugalwali jisne uske saare belief system ke parakhche uda diye. Dekhe yeh jo dialogue hai na, iska background yeh hai ke Euthyphro apne hi sage baap ko prosecute kar raha hai kyunke uske baap ne qatal kar diya hai. Socrates usse kehta hai ke yaar tum apne baap ke upar hi murder ka trial chala rahe ho. Euthyphro jawaab mein kehta hai ke bhai main ek mazhabi shakhs hoon. Aur mazhab yeh kehta hai ke jo shakhs qatal karta hai usko uski saza milni chahiye. So Socrates Euthyphro se puchta hai ke bhai deendari kya hai? Kyunke tumne apne walid ke khilaaf muqaddama dayar kiya hua hai aur tum samajhte ho ke tum ikhlaqi taur par sahi ho. Euthyphro jawaab mein kehta hai ke deendari wohi hai jo khudaon ko pasand hai. Aur chunke khudaon ke nazdeek murder ek galat fel hai, lihaza chahe mera baap bhi ho main usko saza dilwa kar hi rahunga. Ab dekhe, dikhne mein Euthyphro na ek strong position par hai, lekin Socrates ke wisdom ka kamaal dekhe. Woh yahan par ek aisa sawaal uthayega jo Euthyphro ke pure argument ko utha kar bahar phenk dega. Socrates Euthyphro se sawaal karta hai ke kya deendari, neki ke kaam karna isliye achi hai ke use khuda pasand karta hai ya yeh deendari, neki ke kaam karna ache hain. Isliye khuda ko pasand hai. Socrates usse mazeed sawaal karta hai ke tumhare devta, tumhare khuda har waqt toh aapas mein ladte rehte hain. Unki pasandeedgi aur na-pasandeedgi bhi mukhtalif hai. Lihaza is baat se zaahir hota hai ke deendari ki tareef khudaon ki marzi se tay nahi ho sakti. Yaani ke khuda aapko moral code nahi de sakte ke kya sahi hai aur kya galat. Yeh sawaalaat Euthyphro ko paagal kar dete hain, use laajawab kar dete hain. Euthyphro kehta hai, "Yaar Socrates, mujhe na ek kaam yaad aa gaya hai. Main phir aake tumse baat karunga." He gets stuck in a conceptual maze. Socrates ka yeh tareeqa-e-wardaat tha. Woh hamesha isi tarah bade bade scholars ko, bade bade knowledge wale logon ko pareshan kar diya karta tha. Plato is dialogue se saabit hi karna chahta hai ke true knowledge sirf philosophical thinking se hi haasil ho sakti hai. Mazhab ko agar aap bagair kisi sawaal ke apnana lenge toh yeh baat zaroori nahi ke mazhab jo baat kahe woh morally bhi durust ho. Socrates ke mutaabiq true moral philosophy ka aaghaaz hi tab hota hai jab aap mazhabi aqeedah parasti aur tohum parasti ko side mein rakh kar sach ki taraf apne safar ka aaghaaz karte hain. Ab baat karte hain the Apology ki. Yeh darasal woh speech hai jo Socrates ne apne trial ke dauran di. Iska naam toh the Apology hai, lekin Socrates ne pure trial mein kisi bhi qism ki maafi nahi maangi. Usne jury ko bataya ke bhai main toh ek falsafi hoon, main ek philosopher hoon aur mera kaam hai sawaal uthana. Woh jury se kehta hai ke mere upar saalon saal se yeh ilzaam hai ke main ajeeb-o-gareeb baatein karta hoon. Main logon se sawaal karke unko sharminda karta hoon. Main aasmaan ki taraf dekh kar baatein karta hoon. Main khudaon ko lekar bhi sawaalaat karta hoon. Woh kehta hai ke mere paas ek special divine wisdom hai. Mere andar ek mystical awaaz hai. Yeh awaaz hamesha mujhe guide karti hai ke kya cheez sahi hai aur kya galat aur isi internal voice ki basis par main apni zindagi ko conduct karta hoon. Agar yeh gunaah hai toh yeh gunaah maine kiya hai. Socrates jury se kehta hai ke tum log mujhe marna chahte ho na toh maar do. Lekin main apne kaam se baaz nahi aaunga kyunke main khuda ki taraf se tumhare liye ek tohfa hoon. Shayad mere jaisa shakhs phir dobara Athens mein na aa sake. Main mar bhi jaunga toh marne ke baad bhi yehi kaam karta rahunga. Agar tum log samajhte ho ke main tumhare saamne rounga, gidgidaunga, maafiyan maangunga toh yeh tumhari galat fehmi hai. Jury Socrates ka argument sunti hai aur bil aakhir faisla karti hai ke is falsafi ko marna hi hoga. Ab Plato ke Socrates ko lekar next dialogue ki taraf badhte hain jiska naam hai the Crito. Yeh jab main aapse discuss karunga na, isse aapko further clarify ho jayega ke Socrates kitna azeem shakhs tha. So scene yeh hai ke apni maut se ek raat pehle Socrates jail mein qaid hai aur us prison ke andar uska dost Crito usse milne aata hai. Woh Socrates ke saamne haath jodta hai, minnatein karta hai ke bhai tu maafi maang le, tu shehar se chala ja, teri jaan bach jayegi. Aur hum doston ne milke tere liye paisa bhi jama kar liya hai, tu aaram se exile mein reh sakta hai. Ab zara Socrates ka response sunen. Woh kehta hai ke main Athens ka ek shehri hoon aur ek citizen hone ke naate mere upar kuch obligations hain. Aur un obligations mein yeh bhi shamil hai ke State jo faisla kare main us faisle ki respect karoon. Agar aaj main yahan se shehar chhod kar bhaag gaya toh mere baare mein jo bhi ilzaamat hain woh sahi saabit ho jayenge. Aur main aisa kabhi bhi nahi hone dunga. Na toh main State ki laws ke khilaaf jaunga aur na buzdilon ki tarah maut se bach ke shehar chhod kar jaunga. Aur Socrates ki maut ka jo aakhri dialogue hai woh hai the Phaedo. Socrates marne se kuch hi lamhe pehle apne doston se kehta hai ke insaan ki jo ruh hai na, woh amar hoti hai. It's immortal. Aur woh kehta hai ke chunke falsafiyon ka, philosophers ka waise hi duniya ki lazzaton mein, pleasures mein koi interest nahi hota, lihaza they are already half dead. Aur darasal jo philosophical thinking hai that is actually a process of freeing the soul from the body. Yeh maut isi separation ka naam hai. Woh mazeed apne doston se kehta hai ke insaan ki ruh aur uska intellect hi hai jo usko zindagi mein ideas aur concepts ke baare mein samjha paate hain. Insaan ka jism toh darasal jadd banta hai confusion aur error ki. Mazeed woh insaan ki ruh ke baare mein kehta hai ke the soul is invisible and divine. Aur marne ke baad insaan ki yehi ruh hamesha zinda rehti hai. Bas yehi woh lamha hota hai jab ek state official Hemlock jo ek tarah ka zehar hai woh Socrates ke saamne present karta hai. Socrates ek hi ghoont mein pura zehar pee jaata hai. Thodi hi der mein woh zameen par let jaata hai aur bejaan ho jaata hai. Socrates ko toh Athens ki government maar deti hai, lekin uski soch hamesha zinda rehti hai. So doston, yeh thi Sukraat yaani Socrates ki puri kahani. Main hamesha aapse kehta rehta hoon na ke falsafiyon ka naam sainkdon hazaron saal tak zinda rehta hai. Jab is tarah ki buland soch hogi, aisa nazariya hoga, aisi nider personality hogi toh phir kyun na tareekh aapko yaad rakhe. Socrates ki soch se aap log ittefaq karein ya na karein, lekin iski kahani se ek baat toh wazeh ho jati hai ke sawaalaat aapki zindagi ka woh pillar hain jo aapki zindagi ki imaarat ko khada rakhte hain. In baaton ke baare mein zaroor socheyga. Video pasand aayi ho toh like button zaroor press kijiyega. Until next time, goodbye.
